Print Share Add feedback

About this company

View all

RGS Exteriors

GuildQuality Member
Guildmember
Since 2012
GuildQuality Master Award Winner
Guildmaster Award Winner
2013, 2014, 2015
Feedback Milestone
5-Year Anniversary
2017 - See more

Gutter protection (1087)

Gutters (1087)

Seamless gutters (999)

Siding (999)

Projects

View all
All project locations are approximate

Comments

What is this?

What is this?

We display two types of written homeowner feedback on GuildQuality member profile pages: Comments and Reviews.

Comments

In response to our customer satisfaction surveys, homeowners share lots of comments about construction quality, communication, or any other question asked in the survey. Guildmembers can selectively publish these comments here on their profile page.

Reviews

Reviews are different than comments. These are star ratings that homeowners ask us to publish, and they come with a written description of the type of experience they had working with their contractor. We publish all of the reviews we receive: positive and negative alike.

Learn more about reviews and comments.
View all
  • GuildQuality
  • 2012 Qualified Remodeler Top 500
  • 2008 Qualified Remodeler Top 500
  • 2009 Qualified Remodeler Top 500
  • 2010 Qualified Remodeler Top 500

More about RGS Exteriors

As a GuildQuality Guildmember, RGS Exteriors relies on our customer surveying to help them deliver an exceptional customer experience.

We have surveyed customers on behalf of RGS Exteriors in Salt Lake City, UT; Sandy, UT; Layton, UT; West Jordan, UT; Holladay, UT; South Jordan, UT; Murray, UT; Cottonwood Heights, UT; Park City, UT; Bountiful, UT; and 115 other cities in Utah, Yukon Territory, US Minor Outlying Islands, Vermont, Nevada, and 1 other state.

In this report, RGS Exteriors has published a summary of the customer feedback they've received since they joined GuildQuality in March 2012. In that time, 695 out of 1,384 customers (50%) responded to a GuildQuality satisfaction survey, with the most recent response in October 2017.

Flag this review

Please give us a little more information:

The review contains misspellings or improper grammar.

The review contains objectionable language.

Something else:

Thanks for letting us know that this comment may be inappropriate. A member of our team will review the comment.